Dad Sodomized Teen Stepson to Avenge Rape of Daughter

[PatC]

Cops: Dad Sodomized Teen Stepson to Avenge Rape of Daughter (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,322386,00.html)


"FORT WORTH, Texas — A father sodomized his 18-year-old stepson to avenge the teenager's alleged rape of the man's 8-year-old daughter, police said.

The father, 32, turned himself into to authorities on Friday and was released from jail Saturday after posting a $17,500 bond. He faces a charge of aggravated sexual assault.

The stepson was arrested Jan. 2 and charged with suspicion of aggravated sexual assault. Police say the father caught him assaulting his daughter, and a subsequent examination at a hospital revealed the girl had been sodomized."

<snip>

"When the stepson was arrested, the man warned his wife not to get the teenager out of jail. She posted bond for the teen's release. When he called home Jan. 3 after getting released, the father took the call and picked him up, police said.

Instead of taking the teenager home, the Arlington man drove to an abandoned house in Fort Worth, beat his stepson with a baseball bat and sodomized him with a metal tool, police said."

--more at link--

[Roamer]

Oh, my! :shock:

[LiveLaughLuv]

Ouch!

I wonder why the teen wasn't ordered to stay away from that home. If he was caught in the act, why take him back home?

Well there's that eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth mentality. I can't say I blame the father, I may have wanted much of the same if my little girl was hurt.

[Bamaisin]

Ouch!

I wonder why the teen wasn't ordered to stay away from that home. If he was caught in the act, why take him back home?

Well there's that eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth mentality. I can't say I blame the father, I may have wanted much of the same if my little girl was hurt.


Ditto. I can't see me NOT wanting to hurt the bastard. I can only imagine the horror and outrage this father felt.Personally I think he should get a lenient punishment taking in account his mental state. I know I would be fit for a straight jacket if I witnessed my child being abused.

I was wondering why he was allowed to go back home too. :shock:

[Hope]

I would have used a sharp item.

[Roamer]

I agree the boy shouldn't have been allowed back in the home, but I also think the mother shouldn't have bailed him out after he molested her daughter.

I can see the stepdad beating the crap out of him, but sodomizing him? I understand it was to teach him a lesson, which is all well and good. Maybe he can plead temporary insanity.

[Hope]

I agree the boy shouldn't have been allowed back in the home, but I also think the mother shouldn't have bailed him out after he molested her daughter.

I can see the stepdad beating the crap out of him, but sodomizing him? I understand it was to teach him a lesson, which is all well and good. Maybe he can plead temporary insanity.



If I caught a grown man on top of my eight year old child raping her, sodomy would be a blessing to him.

[Roamer]

I hear that. He'd be headed to the hospital instead of jail.

[Hope]

I hear that. He'd be headed to the hospital instead of jail.

I was thinking morgue, but we won't argue over specifics. :22wink:

[KittyMom]

I don't understand this mother???!!!! Did she have no instincts to protect her daughter from this creep??? And what kind of big dummy is he to think he could call home for a ride and his stepfather would just "be over" his sodomizing his stepsister.

I think this is one the courts should stay out of. I'd say the stepson got off lightly compared to what could've happened to him. Can you imagine how the stepdad felt walking in on that? Especially if he's helped to raise the stepson. And then to have the wife bail him out...like she was choosing her son over her daughter. Heck of a situation here.

[LiveLaughLuv]

I think mom should have left him in jail and not bailed him out.

Maybe she is in denial. What she should've done, was told him, I will bail you out but you cannot step foot in our home. He is 18 and considered an adult. He has a problem and should be sent to get help for his problem before he becomes a serial rapist.

There really is no excuse for his actions, he knows right from wrong, what he did to his sister is inexcusable and she will probably have years and years of therapy ahead of her. How sad. :1222423:

[hisgirl_2455]

HeeeHeee Hawhawwww. I bet he was crying and begging...LOL Right on dad!!!

[Tracian]

I agree the boy shouldn't have been allowed back in the home, but I also think the mother shouldn't have bailed him out after he molested her daughter.

I can see the stepdad beating the crap out of him, but sodomizing him? I understand it was to teach him a lesson, which is all well and good. Maybe he can plead temporary insanity.



Thanks for speaking what I was thinking, I could not get my fingers to type after reading that story....

I am unclear, is the mother of the boy also the mother of the little girl?

[Roamer]

That's the way I read it, Tracian. Not that I can even imagine my son doing something like that, but if he did, he'd still be in jail.

I think this boy has a lot of rage, possibly because the little girl got a lot more attention that he did. Which doesn't excuse what he did. Just trying to figure out why.

[Tracian]

That's the way I read it, Tracian. Not that I can even imagine my son doing something like that, but if he did, he'd still be in jail.

I think this boy has a lot of rage, possibly because the little girl got a lot more attention that he did. Which doesn't excuse what he did. Just trying to figure out why.


Thanks for the clarification. I know, I sit here and try to rationalize evil behaviors of people, and sometimes, I think we (collective) have to chalk it up that some just are missing the trait of humanity.

The problem is, that those with the traits of humanity, want to understand and try to fix those that could very simply be beyond fixing.

Very tragic, and painful for all involved, but to be honest, if it was me, my son would either be sitting in jail, or I would be trying to get him in a mental unit; even if he stayed away from my daughter, what about the other innocent children he may come into contact with?

[Details]

I'd never bail the son out, were he mine. He couldn't come home - not ever, period, after doing that to my daughter. So, jail is probably the safest place for him until the trial.

That mother doesn't deserve the title, if she could ever let the son come home to the same house as the little girl lives at.

It's wrong - but I sure can understand that father. And applaud his restraint in not killing the son (I almost typed 'boy' - but he's a full grown man at 18). I'd imagine he used an implement to sodomize him so he gets some small part of what he put the little girl through.

[homealone1]

I would have used a sharp item.
:zm10:

[Emyo]

I'd never bail the son out, were he mine. He couldn't come home - not ever, period, after doing that to my daughter. So, jail is probably the safest place for him until the trial.

That mother doesn't deserve the title, if she could ever let the son come home to the same house as the little girl lives at.

It's wrong - but I sure can understand that father. And applaud his restraint in not killing the son (I almost typed 'boy' - but he's a full grown man at 18). I'd imagine he used an implement to sodomize him so he gets some small part of what he put the little girl through.




What about the judge? Surely some kind of protection order should have been put in place as a condition of his bail. The DA should have made sure of it. Families are strange creatures, imo. Some one involved in the legal system should have been on top of this one. Actually the article doesn't say whether the young man was restricted from contact with his victim ( little sister). Surely the judge ordered a no contact as in you cannot return to the home. I don't know, but we can't have this kind of justice happening, imo.

moo

[Roamer]

The way the article reads, Emyo, is the boy called home after being released and talked to the mother. The stepdad went to pick him up but instead of taking him home, took him somewhere and sodomized him.

Either there wasn't an order saying he couldn't come home, or the son and the mother both ignored it, IMO.

What the son did was horrific. What the stepdad was understandable, but wrong, again IMO.

Tragic story all around.

[KittyMom]

Can you imagine how this young girl would feel to know that her mom is the one who sprang her rapist from jail?

[Sumanadevii]

I have five sons ....trust me...They would fear seeing me more than a courtroom, a jail cell or the other immates.

[Tempus Teapot]

The way the article reads, Emyo, is the boy called home after being released and talked to the mother. The stepdad went to pick him up but instead of taking him home, took him somewhere and sodomized him.

Either there wasn't an order saying he couldn't come home, or the son and the mother both ignored it, IMO.

What the son did was horrific. What the stepdad was understandable, but wrong, again IMO.

Tragic story all around.

I wonder what the IQ of the 18 year old is, that he thought he'd be safe with his step father after his stepfather caught him raping his daughter?

[Roamer]

LOL, Tempus. Good question.

[DDawg]

I guess I'm the only one here who thinks forcible sodomy and assault are wrong and criminal regardless of whether there's a revenge motive involved. Vigilantism is never the right way to handle things. The father should have sought justice in court. Instead he made himself just as much of a lowlife as the stepson. They both ought to be locked up, imo. What a sick, dysfunctional family.

[Details]

I don't think most are saying the father is right. Just that they can understand, and compared to what he no doubt wanted to do to the kid, he did exercise restraint. He's been charged with the crimes you listed, and will go to trial.

But - there is a difference between someone committing forcible sodomy on an innocent 5 year old child, and someone - who knows, without any doubt, that they've got the right person - since the father saw the assault, went to the doctor, and knows the criminal who attacked his daughter - committing forcible sodomy on that criminal.

The motive does matter - one for sick urges, the other for justice or revenge on a criminal - there is a big difference. The stepson is the lowest of the low - he raped a child! The father is wrong - but he's far from the lowest of the low. He attacked a child molester, out of understandable anger, and restrained himself enough to deal out only biblical justice - an eye for an eye, rather than what any father would feel like doing to a monster who could rape a 5 year old girl.

[Sumanadevii]

I guess I'm the only one here who thinks forcible sodomy and assault are wrong and criminal regardless of whether there's a revenge motive involved. Vigilantism is never the right way to handle things. The father should have sought justice in court. Instead he made himself just as much of a lowlife as the stepson. They both ought to be locked up, imo. What a sick, dysfunctional family.

No, DDawg, you're not the only one. I think the father was wrong in his actions. I just meant to say...that my sons would fear seeing me....They would fear what I would say. They would fear me taking them by the ear. They would fear the look on my face. I sure wouldn't be kind. But assault them sexually...no...absolutely not....

And Mommy wouldn't find a dime for their defense. Mommy wouldn't supply even the smallest item for their use. NOTHING....

In fact, should one of mine do something so stupid and mean, I doubt they would bother calling. They know what the answer would be...

[Tracian]

One thing that was not mentioned in the article is the attitude of the stepson; was he contrite, or obnoxious? Did he make comments that made the father 'snap'?

I don't put the father and the stepson in the same category, no more than I would a woman that hunts down the man that brutally rapes her, and she kills him.

Is it *right* no, but there is mitigating factors that do make a difference. The stepfather not have done his act, if his child was not attacked; just as the analogy regarding the woman that was raped--their acts were the 'effect' of their victimization.

Most Shocking had a clip in a courtroom, where the family of a convicted murderer began making comments to the victims family--they were upset because the criminal got life in prison, because the person he killed was a 60+ year old man, and was going to die 'sooner than later' anyway, and their family member had his 'whole life ahead of him' (He should have thought of that before he beat this old man to death on the street, just because he was 'bored')

Anyway, the family of the victim, after listening to the sick remarks, lost it, and a fray broke out....now under normal circumstances those people would not have attacked anyone....which goes to prove that for every action there is a sometimes unequal reaction....it's called human nature.

[KittyMom]

One thing that was not mentioned in the article is the attitude of the stepson; was he contrite, or obnoxious? Did he make comments that made the father 'snap'?

I don't put the father and the stepson in the same category, no more than I would a woman that hunts down the man that brutally rapes her, and she kills him.

Is it *right* no, but there is mitigating factors that do make a difference. The stepfather not have done his act, if his child was not attacked; just as the analogy regarding the woman that was raped--their acts were the 'effect' of their victimization.

Most Shocking had a clip in a courtroom, where the family of a convicted murderer began making comments to the victims family--they were upset because the criminal got life in prison, because the person he killed was a 60+ year old man, and was going to die 'sooner than later' anyway, and their family member had his 'whole life ahead of him' (He should have thought of that before he beat this old man to death on the street, just because he was 'bored')

Anyway, the family of the victim, after listening to the sick remarks, lost it, and a fray broke out....now under normal circumstances those people would not have attacked anyone....which goes to prove that for every action there is a sometimes unequal reaction....it's called human nature.

:hifive: great post