PDA

View Full Version : You don't need to find the corpse to convict the killer: Part 2


rockford2
12-03-2007, 10:46 PM
The suburban wife and mother vanished suddenly and completely – simply left home one day, her husband said, and never came back. Their marriage was headed for divorce and she'd confided to others that she feared for her life. But during the massive, multi-agency manhunt that followed, the husband said, oh well, his wife had probably just run off with someone else.

This was in 1977.


Police and the public were very suspicious of the man, Edward Lyng of Palatine, even as today they're very suspicious of Bolingbrook Police Sgt. Drew Peterson, whose wife Stacy disappeared Oct 28, three days after the 30th anniversary of the superficially similar disappearance of Stephanie Lyng.

The Lyng story was huge, even without cable news channels to fuel the nation's interest. Stephanie was the daughter of Sun-Times columnist Dorsey Connors (who died in September, 2007), and Edward was the wealthy owner of a vending machine company.

As the search for Stephanie Lyng dragged on, the common fear --- like the fear today in the Peterson case, the Lisa Stebic case in Plainfield and other ominous missing-spouse cases --- was that if she had been murdered, there'd be no way, without a body, to prove it, much less convict anyone for the crime.

The assumption sounds obvious. People do run away, after all -- change their identities and disappear into the vastness of the world. Unless you find someone's corpse you can never be 100 percent certain he or she is even dead, much less the victim of foul play.

But the assumption is wrong.

"There have been a substantial number of successful murder prosecutions based solely on circumstantial evidence that a murder occurred," said Fordham University law professor Deborah Denno, who has studied the case law in this area. The body is "a key piece of evidence," she said, "but it is just one piece of evidence."

Courts have repeatedly held that other evidence – such as blood stains, apparent efforts to remove blood stains, a stormy history with the victim and even the defendant's lack of distress at the victim's disappearance – can add up to proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in what are informally called "no-body" cases.

The legal standard is not 100 percent certainty, observed Ronald Allen, an expert on evidence and criminal procedure at the Northwestern University School of Law. "The burden is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and though that burden obviously gets higher without a body, it's not insurmountable."

In the Lyng case, for instance, investigators learned from one of Ed Lyng's former employees that she had helped him leave his wife's car at a remote parking lot at O'Hare International Airport on the day she vanished. That wasn't enough for an indictment. Neither was a statement from one of Ed Lyng's nephews that Lyng had offered him $50,000 to kill Stephanie.

It wasn't until 1992 that the ex-employee finally told investigators that Lyng had drawn her into his scheme, told her how he'd stabbed Stephanie and dumped her body in a remote area of Lake County, then threatened to have her killed if she told on him.

That was enough. Cook County prosecutors didn't have a body or a murder weapon, but they still had enough to convict Lyng of murder in March, 1994.

The following year he was convicted of trying to hire people in jail to kill two witnesses against him. He's now at Menard Correctional Center and will not be eligible for release until September 2026, when he'll be nearly 92 . (left is his most recent Illinois Dept. of Corrections mug shot)

As noted, the similarities between the Lyng case and the high-profile missing-wife cases so much in the local news this year are superficial and, possibly, irrelevant. No one has been charged in the Peterson or Stebic cases.

Stephanie Lyng has never been found. But her story calls out reassuringly from across the years: You don't necessarily need to find the victim in order to find justice.



MURDER AND BETRAYAL
FOR NEARLY 20 YEARS EDWARD LYNG GOT AWAY WITH KILLING HIS WIFE, AND ONLY NOW ARE HIS FOUR ABUSED DAUGHTERS OUT OF HARM'S WAY

By Maurice Possley, Chicago Tribune
.November 24, 1996

There aren't many metaphors that adequately describe life for Allison, Kelly, Jennifer and Dorsey Lyng after their mother, Stephanie, disappeared on Oct. 25, 1977.

Hell, it appears, just scratches the surface.

To begin with, their father, Edward, was a mean-spirited, violent-tempered, alcoholic philanderer even before he stabbed his wife to death in the family garage, buried the body, told everyone she had abandoned the family, then forbade the girls from ever mentioning her name again.

This is a tale with more elements than a chemistry book-among them: fear, murder, betrayal, infidelity, cruelty, revenge, wealth and power.

For nearly 20 years, the daughters of Stephanie Lyng have lived under a cloud of anguish. Now, at last, there has been partial closure. In the last two and a half years, after thousands of investigative manhours, two juries have found their father guilty of the murder of their mother and of hiring hitmen to kill the chief witness against him.

And in September, a Cook County Circuit Court jury took away what they believe was their father's last weapon against them-his money. A jury found Lyng liable for $66.4 million in damages for the murder of Stephanie. The amount of the verdict was a statement of the jury's outrage, as Ed Lyng's net worth is closer to $4 million.

For the four daughters, however, it stands as insurance against the slim possibility that a man they hate and fear could one day assemble the resources to hire a killer again.

Now, the daughters hope to put behind them such routines as the daily check for a bomb before starting the family car or heightened vigilance against the possible abduction of one of their children.

For Ed Lyng, 62, his daily routine is played out in the Joliet Correctional Center where he is serving a prison sentence of 65 years. He realizes that, barring a reversal by an appellate court, he will likely die there.

"It is ironic," he said in a recent interview at the prison. "I began my life studying to be a priest, living in what we called cells. I left the life because I did not want to take vows of celibacy and poverty. Here, 45 years later, I'm back in a cell, I practice poverty, chastity and obedience."

Lyng adamantly proclaims that he did not murder Stephanie.

"One of these days she could still walk in," he insists. "It's highly remote. But wouldn't that be something? There would be some very embarrassed jurors and judges and prosecutors."

For the three men who took part in the two prosecutions of Ed Lyng-Patrick O'Brien, James McKay and Scott Cassidy-there is no doubt that he was the killer. "Ed Lyng should face up to his moral responsibility and give those girls some peace by telling us where the body is," McKay says.

And so the daughters still await a final closure. Their perhaps futile vigil is a silent one, as they have refused to grant interviews. The descriptions of their lives as well as the accounts of friends, neighbors and others, drawn from yellowed newspaper clippings, police reports, depositions and transcripts from the three trials, tell the story of their parents, Stephanie and Ed Lyng.-

The mystery began on a cold, drizzly October morning in 1977 when Stephanie Lyng, 39, backed her blue station wagon out of the drive of the family's split-level home at 1328 E. Sanborn Drive in northwest suburban Palatine.

She had hustled the four daughters, then 9 to 15, off to school. Ed had left in his car for the vending company he owned, Lyng Canteen Service Co. in Elgin.

Seemingly a portrait of calm and happiness, life in the Lyng household was on edge. Stephanie was suing for divorce. Her discussions with Ed about money had been bitter.

On that morning, Stephanie's destination was five blocks away, the house of a friend, where she dropped off a check to pay for a Girl Scout trip to Washington, D.C. She left immediately.

"I can't stay for coffee," Stephanie told her friend. "The carpet men are coming this morning to install the new carpet. I don't want to miss them."

Around 10:30 a.m., two men arrived and rang the front doorbell. They noticed wet car tracks in front of the garage, but when no one came to the door, the men left.

Stephanie Lyng was never seen again.

Her disappearance sparked a furious police investigation, but despite lengthy grand jury probes and scores of tips, the case would remain a mystery for 15 years.

Stephanie Lyng was born into a family of wealth and power in Chicago. Her grandfather, William, was committeeman of the Near North Side 42nd Ward and was an Illinois state senator for 27 years. Her mother, Dorsey Connors, was a popular Chicago television personality known for her shows specializing in household, beauty and fashion hints.

Stephanie's father was Joseph Kroeck, a football star at DePaul University in Chicago and Catholic University in Washington, D.C. He began his career as a stockbroker, then quit to join the U.S. Army in 1936 to learn how to fly. He and Dorsey were married in 1937, and Stephanie was born the following year.

Stephanie grew up in a home where the utensils were silver, oil portraits hung from the walls and a housekeeper attended to daily chores. She attended the Latin school, Vassar College and Barat College but was only an average student and did not graduate. At one point she considered joining a convent; then, in the fall of 1959, she enrolled at Loyola University Chicago. There she met Ed Lyng, who sat next to her in philosophy class. They soon fell in love. The following summer, after a tour of the Orient with her father, Stephanie announced she would marry Ed on Jan. 14, 1961, at Holy Name Cathedral. The announcement was reported in newspaper society columns.

Ed Lyng's path to Loyola was a circuitous one. The son of Richard and Rose Lyng, Ed was raised on the South Side, largely in the area of 75th Street and Wabash Avenue. But for one tragic exception, his name would not make the newspapers until Stephanie disappeared.

Ed attended neighborhood grammar schools, but went out of state to high school, enrolling at Divine Heart Seminary, a preparatory school run by an order of priests known as the Sacred Heart Fathers in Donaldson, Ind. The Lyng family was deeply religious.

Tragedy visited his life at an early age. On May 24, 1952, days from his graduation from the seminary, Ed, then 18, was home, driving a car carrying his mother and a brother, Harold, when it was struck by a train at 143rd Street and Southwest Highway, in Orland Park. The auto's gas tank exploded. Ed's mother, Rose, 50, was hurled from the vehicle and crippled for life. His brother, Harold, 17, was killed. Ed, burned severely, was so traumatized that rescue workers had to break his fingers to remove his hands from the steering wheel.

Ed took his preliminary vows 15 months later and went on to the Sacred Heart Monastery in Hales Corners, Wis., just outside Milwaukee. He studied to be a foreign missionary. But ultimately he "decided a life of celibacy was not for me," he said in the interview. "I left and enrolled in night school at Loyola University to pursue a career in business."-

At first, Stephanie and Ed lived in Wilmette, where he worked for a heating supply company. Shortly thereafter, Ed went to work as a route man for Canteen Corp., a vending machine firm. He worked his way into management, leading the family out of state, to New Jersey, Florida, Texas and Pennsylvania, before they returned to the Chicago area in 1972 when Ed was offered an opportunity to buy into a vending franchise in Elgin.

By then, the family had expanded. Dorsey, the eldest, was born in 1962. Jennifer was born a little more than two years later, Karen (who would be called Kelly) was born in the summer of 1965, and the youngest, Allison, came along in January 1968.

It is with mixed emotions that their next door neighbor on Sanborn Drive, Harriett "Lori" Freeh, recalls the first months after the family moved into their split-level frame home.

"Almost every evening the kids would all get out in the yard and play together after school," she said. "And Ed would come home, and we'd all stand around and talk."

Beneath this peaceful portrait, however, were tremors of future ugliness. The women in the neighborhood found Ed had more than just the typical neighborly interest. Within weeks after moving in, Lyng "suggested that we start an affair," Freeh said. "He explained to me how many affairs he'd had in his life." The comments came almost weekly. "He thought he was a real Don Juan."

The seamy situation came to a head two years later, in 1974, when the neighbors organized a 4th of July picnic and declined to invite the Lyngs. Stephanie was devastated and sought the Freeh's counsel.

"That's when she really opened up and let me know what was going on," Freeh said. "Ed didn't care. From then on, I was the confidante of Stephanie."

For two more years, the crumbling marriage remained an ugly secret. Ed drank heavily and isolated himself from his family. Each evening, upon arriving home from Lyng Canteen Service offices, Ed went straight to the den where he poured a drink and waited for his dinner to be served. He ate alone while Stephanie and the girls dined in the kitchen.

He was given to explosions of temper, usually behind closed doors. But Freeh recalled an evening when Ed was playing tennis in the driveway with Kelly, who was not yet a teenager. Kelly knocked a return over Ed's head and it shattered a window in the home.

"He went into a rage," Freeh said.

It was almost as if there were two families in the Lyng household-Stephanie and the girls on one side, Ed on the other. Stephanie pushed the girls to become involved in sports and extra-curricular activities. She chauffeured them everywhere-to school, 4-H club, Girl Scouts, soccer games and swim meets, to the opera, the ballet and museums.

At the same time, she began planning for a life without Ed. She enrolled at nearby Harper College and in September 1974 received a license to sell real estate.

Among those who did have an inkling of trouble were Michael Kelly, who had befriended Stephanie while they were in high school, and his wife, Trudy, of Chicago, perhaps Stephanie's closest friends. Sometime in 1975, Stephanie confided to Trudy that her marriage was in deep trouble. "He physically abused her . . . is what she told me," Trudy Kelly said.

In December 1975, Stephanie saw a lawyer about filing divorce papers. "She was becoming more afraid," Trudy Kelly said. "(Ed) told her that some day she would be taking a very long bath."

The papers were filed in court in October 1976. Less than two weeks later, Stephanie sought out a neighbor, Paul Biebel Jr., then an assistant Cook County state's attorney. "She asked me to prepare a will," said Biebel. "She said that she believed her husband was going to kill her. She believed he would do it, and she believed he would get caught. I prepared it on the spot."

Divorce was not an option for Ed Lyng. A strict Catholic, Lyng would not listen to Stephanie's talk of it.

"He firmly believed you stayed married forever," Freeh said. The girls were not spared. One afternoon, Ed called daughter Dorsey into her bedroom, then closed the door.

"I want you to tell Mommy that you want to live with me if we get divorced," Dorsey remembers him saying. "I was scared to death. I told him I couldn't do that."

At a summer barbecue at the Lyng home just months before Stephanie disappeared, Ed sidled up to Trudy Kelly.

"What did Stephanie say about the divorce?" he prodded.

"Simply that she wants a divorce," Trudy said evasively.

Lyng's temper flashed.

"I hope you know that she will never get away with this," he snapped. "Nobody will ever take my children or my home from me. Understand-she will never, ever get away with this."

Kelly was terrified. "I couldn't say anything at the time because everybody was there. Afterward, I told my husband my fear and my fear for Stephanie," she said. "I called her the next morning and told her to get out while she still had a chance. At that point, she told me she thought she could handle it."

One late afternoon, Freeh and Stephanie sat on the steps of the Lyng home, watching their children frolic in the leaves.

"Lori," Stephanie said. "He's going to kill me."

"Can't we call the police?" Freeh asked.

Stephanie's answer suggested that was something she had considered already. "There's no evidence," she said.

By early fall, Lyng had joined Alcoholics Anonymous and was still attempting a reconciliation. But on Oct. 21, 1977, he learned that under a change in Illinois divorce law, Stephanie could get as much as 65 percent of his company.

That, apparently, sealed Stephanie's fate.

An already fractured home was ripped apart on Oct. 25, 1977, when Jennifer, 13, came home from school and could not find her mother. She walked next door.

"Mrs. Freeh," she said. "Mom's not home."

Freeh recalled that Stephanie's car had been acting up and reassured Jennifer, suggesting that her mother had taken the car to a repair shop. Soon, Dorsey, then Kelly and Allison, arrived home. Still no Mom.

Shortly after 7 p.m., Freeh telephoned and Dorsey picked up the receiver.

"Mrs. Freeh," she said. "She's not home."

"Honey," Freeh said, "if she's not home, it's because she can't get home. Call the police."

By the time Ed Lyng finally came home that night, the police had filled out a missing persons report and left. Tearfully, Dorsey rushed to greet her father. "Dad," she said, "Mom's not home."

Brusquely, her father pushed past her. "She's probably out selling a house," he declared. "She'll be home later." Dorsey put her sisters to sleep, reassuring them that their mother would be home soon, then sat up until dawn. The next morning, their father's only comment was that Stephanie must have run away.

Three days later, when Stephanie's station wagon was found in a remote parking lot at O'Hare International Airport and bloodstains found in the car matched Stephanie's blood type, Lyng became the prime suspect. But after giving an initial statement, Lyng refused to talk further.

His alibi, provided by Christine Rezba, a former vending-route worker for Lyng, was unshakable. She said that she had met him by chance on the day Stephanie disappeared and they discussed her possible return to the vending firm. Rezba claimed she was not romantically involved with Lyng, but after acquaintances suggested otherwise, police suspicion of Lyng grew.

It was a massive investigation, involving not only the Palatine and Chicago police, but the Cook County Sheriff's police and State's Attorney's office, the FBI, the Illinois Attorney General's office and the Illinois State police.

The police searched the Lyng home eight days after Stephanie's disappearance but found nothing. Stephanie's mother, Dorsey Connors, offered a $10,000 reward. Seeds found on the floor of Stephanie's car were analyzed by a biologist and determined to be from a plant found commonly in the woods, prompting some digging and dredging in forest preserves near the airport. Nothing was turned up.

Rezba and Lyng were called before a grand jury, but both refused to testify, asserting their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. For more than two months, Rezba was kept under surveillance but did nothing suspicious. The case had turned into a waiting game.

For the girls, it was the beginning of a nightmare.

To be continued.....:1222423:

rockford2
12-03-2007, 10:48 PM
The verbal and emotional battering at the hands of their father intensified, the girls would later recall. And Stephanie, their refuge, was not there to console, to shield, to give them strength.

Gradually, Lyng erected a barrier around his daughters. After Dorsey Connors angrily voiced her suspicion that her son-in-law was behind the disappearance, Lyng cut off all communication between her and her granddaughters. He cut off Betty Kunzweiler, a neighbor named in Stephanie's will as guardian of the girls. "Mr. Lyng threatened my life if I pursued an interest or further contact with the girls," she said.

Lyng did provide financially for his daughters. Each had a checking account and was given a car at 16. There were nine trips to Europe and Caribbean cruises every Christmas. Even these times were marred because Lyng spent time trying to pick up women.

Each daughter handled the disappearance differently. Dorsey, as the eldest, stepped into her mother's shoes. She assumed the job of chauffeur and she tried to be the glue-the protector, guide and source of solace -that Stephanie had been.

"She literally took on the responsibility of these children to make sure they were in school every day and at the proper places where they should be," Trudy Kelly said. "Everything a mother would do."

Lyng remained distant. Nightly, he took his meals in the family room, fortified himself with gin and watched television. His daughters learned to grow up alone.

Their mother was not discussed. The girls learned of the investigation through newspaper articles that Lyng clipped and left on the kitchen table.

Kelly, the third daughter, would later recall, "We knew he was a suspect. He told us more than once that she left us. He was always trying to blame her for what happened."

At night, the girls wept silently in their beds. "When he walked by, I had to hold my breath because if he heard me, he'd be mad," Allison said.

Lyng's criticisms increased. On the witness stand in the civil lawsuit, the four women provided examples: If he caught them washing dishes and using hot water to rinse, Lyng exploded. He ranted over lights being left on. He called the girls whores for wearing makeup. On the weekends, the girls would say later, he spent his time at the country club, playing cards and drinking.

Kelly struggled to find parental love. "I wanted a father-daughter relationship," she said later. "I didn't have a mother-I wanted a relationship." She would be plagued for years by twisted emotions, and continued to invite her father back into her life, each time to suffer new emotional agony as Lyng drank himself into raging tirades.

Jennifer suffered back spasms, brought on by the stress of living in that unpredictable home. If she brought friends home, Lyng was on his best behavior, putting on what the girls called the "Father of the Year Act." Jennifer came home from a vacation with her father so depressed that she went immediately to Freeh's door. Clearly agitated, Jennifer blurted out: "He's got a gun. I'm going to kill him and then myself." Freeh consoled her and covertly arranged for Jennifer to obtain counseling.

The youngest, Allison, a 4th grader when Stephanie disappeared, was the last daughter at home as her sisters successively went off to college. The most rebellious of the daughters, she clashed often with her father but hid behind a protective shield constructed so tightly that nearly 20 years later she has yet to shed a tear.

Her relationship with her father finally broke on April 14, 1984, when Allison, then 16, accidentally locked herself out of the house. She used a neighbor's phone to locate her father at the country club and offered to walk over-a 10 minute stroll-so she could borrow his garage door opener to get into the house. Irate at being interrupted, Lyng drove home and exploded, chasing Allison to her bedroom where he slapped her face bloody. She cowered in fear in her room until she heard him walk to the family room, then fled to a neighbor and called the police.

Defiantly, Allison filed a battery charge against her father and moved in with the Kellys in Chicago. But after Lyng was found guilty of battery, put on court supervision for a year and ordered not to touch her, she moved back to be near her school friends.

The investigation was stymied until 1982, when an abandoned building on land owned by Lyng in Elgin was torched, apparently an arson. The land had long been viewed by the police as a possible burial site. Authorities flew a plane over the site, using a device designed to detect heat generated by a decomposing body. Heavy equipment was brought out, as were volunteers with shovels, but they found nothing.

Investigators hauled Rezba before the grand jury again, this time with a grant of immunity, and she told a different story, saying that instead of bumping into Lyng on the highway, Lyng had called her office and asked her to meet him in a parking lot.

When she arrived, he was waiting in Stephanie's blue station wagon. She followed him to O'Hare, where he parked the car in the remote lot, then took him back to his car and they parted, she told the grand jury. Her testimony was insufficient to charge Lyng. There still was no body.

The relationship between Lyng and his daughters finally collapsed in 1987 when Allison prepared to go off to college, and Lyng realized he would be left alone. In a confrontation with all four daughters, he threatened to cut them out of his will, then delivered the most chilling words of all: "Your mother tried to leave me, and looked what happened to her."

The daughters left the next morning and didn't look back.

Alone, Lyng now ate in the silence of his dining room, by candlelight. A housekeeper prepared and served his dinners.

And that's where the story might have ended. But then, in the fall of 1992, Lyng reported to the police that his vending company had been burgled. As part of routine questioning of Lyng's employees, investigators talked to James Schweiger, Lyng's nephew, who believed that his uncle considered him a suspect. Angrily, he told the officers that a month before Stephanie disappeared, Lyng had offered him $50,000 to kill her. The investigators persuaded Schweiger to tape-record four conversations with Lyng. But Lyng was cagey, making only a tacit admission at best, and lacing the conversation without outright denials. Authorities still didn't have enough.

"We took the tapes and tracked down Christine Rezba Knutson (she had remarried)," recalls former assistant Cook County State's Atty. Patrick O'Brien. "We gave her another grand jury subpoena."

This time, Rezba spilled a much different story, one that resulted in Lyng's indictment for Stephanie's murder on Nov. 12, 1992. When Rezba took the witness stand at Lyng's trial in March 1994, her words were chilling.

Lyng, she said, had begun asking her out while she was working on her vending route. She rebuffed him at first, then succumbed to a lunch invitation, then later, to a dinner date. They began meeting in her apartment in the mornings for coffee before she went on her route, where discussions of their families led to frank talk of how each was trapped in a bad marriage. Later, she said, the relationship became sexual.

Rezba left the company in early 1977 for a better paying job, and their relationship tapered off until late summer, when Lyng came calling again. "He said he had to find a way to stop the divorce," Rezba said. "He said (Stephanie) was wanting $2,000 or $3,000 a month, and no court or no judge or no jury was going to have him pay that kind of money or take his children from him."

She recalled the day Stephanie disappeared, how Lyng had called her to follow him to O'Hare where he dropped off Stephanie's station wagon; then she drove him back.

"He was very nervous and hyper," she said, adding that he said little until they were on the tollway. "He told me to pull over on the shoulder to the right. So I started to stop and he said: 'No, don't stop. Just pull over.' He rolled down the window and he says, 'I got to get rid of a knife.' He opened the window and threw it out."

When Rezba tried to ask questions, Lyng was curt. "Don't ask questions," he said.

Two nights later, Lyng called her and said to expect a visit from the police. He instructed her to say that they had met along the road and later met for lunch.

"He kept on saying: 'You've got to tell them this," she recalled. "If you don't do as I request, you could be taken care of.' "

Lyng called again and again. Each time the message was the same. Two weeks later, Lyng came to her apartment. What happened next was terrifying.

"We sat down on the sofa and he says he had to get rid of his wife," Rezba said. "He had gotten rid of her. He had stabbed her and hit her in the head with a gun. He said he had got up and left for work as usual and then he parked the car in a parking lot not far from the house. And he came back in the back way and hid in the closet off the family room. I guess his wife went out somewhere. When she came back in through the garage entrance, he killed her.

Rezba sat transfixed as Lyng recounted how he knocked Stephanie unconscious with a handgun, then tied her up. She regained consciousness long enough to recognize her husband. "He said she knew she was dying and she said that he wouldn't get away with it . . . then he killed her. He stabbed her . . . wrapped the body and put it in the station wagon . . . and drove to Lake County and buried her.

Three weeks later, a worried Lyng returned to her apartment, fretting that authorities were closing in. Rezba was sent reeling again when Lyng revealed that he had gone back to Stephanie's grave site, dug up the body and knocked out all her teeth in an attempt to prevent her identification if the site was discovered.

Lyng strengthened his grip of fear over Rezba in 1982, when he found out that after she was called before the grand jury a second time, she admitted picking him up at O'Hare.

Bluntly, Lyng delivered the threat that would seal Rezba's lips for the next 10 years. If he were ever charged with Stephanie's murder, Rezba would be killed. He had already paid someone $50,000 to carry out the contract, he declared.

In March 10, 1994, as his daughters looked on, Lyng was convicted of murder and taken to Cook County Jail.

His legal troubles had only begun. His daughters had decided that a conviction and prison term-he received a sentence of 15 to 50 years-were not enough and had retained the law firm of Hopkins & Sutter to take legal action to recover damages for the death of their mother. On April 20, 1994, attorneys Michael Ficaro, John Brooks and John Ratnaswamy filed suit seeking all of Lyng's more than $4 million in assets.

At the jail, greedy inmates anticipated the arrival of the multimillionaire, a man they pounced upon, demanding favors and cash in return for offers of protection from gangs and sexual assault.

The first to latch onto Lyng was Raymond Burke, 53, a career criminal who had spent most of his life behind bars. Convicted four times for car theft, armed robbery and attempted murder, Burke was back in jail on a charge of armed robbery. He was facing a life prison term if convicted.

Burke saw Lyng as his meal ticket out of jail, beginning by offering to pick up Lyng's meal tray and performing other small favors.

Burke's efforts appeared to pay off when, one day in early April, Lyng "mentioned he could help me get out on bond if I could help him with his problem," Burke said.

Lyng offered to post the $7,500 needed for Burke's release on bond and, in return, asked Burke to scare off a man who had begun dating his girlfriend.

"If that didn't work, I was to take him out," Burke said. After that, Burke allegedly was to tackle a second job-the murder of Christine Rezba.

In a matter of days, Lyng arranged for his brother, Joseph, to leave $7,500 in cash in an envelope under a Chicago Tribune newspaper box outside a Dunkin' Donuts shop on Chicago's Northwest Side. Burke's brother, Frank, picked up the money, posted bond, and Raymond was released.

But before Burke could act on Lyng's plan, fate intervened.

Frank Burke would recall later that he happened to mention the mysterious cash to his ex-wife. ("We're still best of friends," he said.) Frank was suspicious of his brother's story, that he had been hired to paint a man's house, and the $7,500 was payment in advance so he could get out of jail to do the work.

Frank Burke's ex-wife is the cousin of a Chicago police officer, and when she related the story of Raymond Burke's release, the officer contacted Lt. John Duffy, who began investigating. Raymond Burke was arrested and searched. He agreed to cooperate.

Meanwhile, Lyng was becoming more anxious to get out of jail. A judge, acting on the lawsuit filed by his daughters, had frozen his millions in assets.

Six days later, Burke, wearing an eavesdropping device, visited Lyng at the jail to discuss their plans.

Through the glass divider in the jail visiting room Lyng dispensed detailed advice on the murder of Rezba's new male friend: "He has to . . . go under water with weights," he said at one point, "or you have to have a spade and dig a reasonably deep hole and put a lot of crap on top of it. You know, logs, rocks, bricks. It can't look like it's just been dug up because someone's going to, sure as hell, find it and dig."

Days later, Lyng was indicted on charges of solicitation to commit murder, wiping out any chance of his getting released on an appeal bond. Worse, he was transferred to the jail's solitary confinement unit. That's when Lyng discovered how miserable jail can be. Locked up for 23 out of every 24 hours, he was not allowed to fraternize with any of the other nine inmates in the unit. Lyng resorted to passing notes, to snatches of conversation during his one hour out of his cell and to a friendship cultivated with Mauricio Valdez, 21, a convicted car thief who was in the adjacent cell. They talked through a light switch that shared a communal wall.

Both men saw in the other an opportunity to get out of jail, investigators would say later. To Lyng, Valdez was a street-smart gang member who could arrange the murders of Rezba and Raymond Burke, the two main witnesses against him. To Valdez, Lyng was a target, a man whose words could be turned over to authorities in return for a reduced sentence. Lyng signed over title to his Cadillac as a down payment on a $100,000 contract for the murders. He drew up instructions detailing how to murder Rezba:

"Tape mouth, then loose tape with gauze or cotton around nose. Add chloroform til she is out. Undress, run hot water in bathtub, use razor blade on one wrist, wait until sure she is dead. Leave blade with her prints on it."

In the instructions Lyng told Valdez that the killer should flash a huge wad of money in Rezba's face and promise it was hers if she would write three letters saying she was sorry, that she had lied at Lyng's murder trial and that Lyng was innocent.

"Flash big bucks, tell her it's $400,000," the instructions said. "Choice of 3 cities like Memphis, Dallas, Phoenix, furnished apartment, good job if wanted, will give her all new I.D."

One letter was to be sent to Lyng's lawyer, another to the state's attorney's office and the third was to be left in Rezba's home. Then, Rezba was to be killed, Lyng wrote.

Valdez went to the authorities, and Lyng was indicted again, this time for soliciting the murders of Rezba and Burke. Lyng contended it was all make-believe, a game of "what if?" played by inmates imagining what they could do to get out of jail.

On Nov. 17, 1995, Lyng was convicted of contract murder solicitation. Sentenced to an additional 50 years, Lyng declared: "I will die in prison."

Nearly a year later, Ed Lyng remained in his cell at the Joliet Correctional Center while in the courtroom of Circuit Judge John Virgilio on Tuesday, Sept. 3, a jury hearing the lawsuit brought by Dorsey, Kelly, Jennifer and Allison returned its verdict and awarded them $66.4 million, ensuring that Lyng will die virtually penniless.

The verdict came one day after Stephanie Lyng's birthday; she would have been 58. Tears brimming in her eyes, Stephanie's eldest daughter, Dorsey, hugged her sisters. "It's over," she said, her words a whisper. "It's over."


http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2007/11/lyng.html

:1222423: