PDA

View Full Version : Shocking Breaches of Security at Federal Buildings!


Roamer
07-08-2009, 04:17 PM
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8025140&page=1

'Shocking' Security Breaches at Federal Buildings


Government Investigators Smuggle in Bomb Parts, Find Guards Sleeping on the Job


By PIERRE THOMAS and JACK DATE
July 8, 2009


It only took 27 seconds for him to smuggle live bomb components (http://javascript<b></b>:openPopup('http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=8023150', 'popup', 1010, 700, 'status=1, resizable=1');) through security detail in a federal building. Later, he assembled a bomb in the restroom, and then walked around the facility undetected.

Video shows investigators taking bomb making materials into buildings undetected


In that instance, it was a congressional investigator testing security procedures. But the investigation into the agency charged with protecting federal buildings revealed security gaps that could prove dangerous if a terrorist group or individual (http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=7734390&page=1) focuses an attack on a federal building.

Investigators from the Government Accountability Office, Congress' investigative arm, were able to penetrate all 10 of the undisclosed federal buildings it tested across the United States.

Watch the full report tonight on "World News with Charles Gibson" at 6:30 p.m. ET

"Of the 10 Level IV facilities we penetrated, 8 were government-owned, 2 were leased, and included offices of a U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative, as well as agencies such as the Departments of Homeland Security, State, and Justice," according to a preliminary report from the GAO. Level IV facilities are defined as having more than 450 employees and "a high volume of public contact."

"It's stunning. It's shocking," Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., the chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, told ABC News.
"It just says that basically some people have forgotten the lessons of 9/11 (http://a.abcnews.com/Politics/story?id=5777731&page=1)," he continued.

(http://helpfindthemissing.org/Video/playerIndex?id=4630236)


The Federal Protective Service, a part of the Department of Homeland Security, is responsible for securing more than 9,000 federal buildings and, among other employees, utilizes 15,000 contract security guards.
The GAO has been investigating the service since 2007 for a wide range of reported problems, and says it found serious vulnerabilities (http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/FedCrimes/story?id=4628707&page=1) during visits to the 10 buildings.

ABC News obtained videos and images (http://javascript<b></b>:openPopup('http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=8023150', 'popup', 1010, 700, 'status=1, resizable=1');) from the GAO investigation. Investigators are slated to publish their latest findings in a report later this summer, but Lieberman's staff said he found the information compiled so troubling that he scheduled a hearing for today.

"What troubles me most is that what GAO found indicates systemic problems," Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said at today's hearing. "If GAO had been successful in smuggling bomb components into one or maybe two buildings, it still would have been troubling, especially since these are high risk, high security buildings, but the fact that GAO succeeded each and every time is so troubling and it indicates a pervasive systemic problem."

Security officials say federal facilities -- as the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building (http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=7908273) in Oklahoma City demonstrated -- remain a primary target.

"Just think about it. In this case, in this GAO test, 10 different federal buildings in different cities in the country were all compromised," Lieberman told ABC News. "If a terrorist group just did that in two or three federal buildings, it would not only really hurt some people; it would create a real crisis of confidence here in the United States about our homeland security (http://abcnews.go.com/WN/story?id=3451976&page=1)."

texanne
07-08-2009, 05:03 PM
The Homeland Security people have been a joke from day one (IMHO). It reminds me of the saying on T-shirts in the 80's..." How many were there, which way did they go....tell me quick...I'm the leader" Heads need to roll till SOMEONE can get it right.

Big Ben
07-08-2009, 05:29 PM
What troubles me is making this news public,for all walks of life good & bad to see.
Maybe they should address this problem behind closed doors & heads should roll but dont make it public & compound a bad situation.

Roamer
07-08-2009, 05:35 PM
You're probably right, Ben. They tell (in my opinion) us way too much.

Claycat
07-08-2009, 06:28 PM
The Homeland Security people have been a joke from day one (IMHO). It reminds me of the saying on T-shirts in the 80's..." How many were there, which way did they go....tell me quick...I'm the leader" Heads need to roll till SOMEONE can get it right.


You are right, Texanne! The funny thing is, I have heard about people getting arrested for taking photos of federal buildings. Yet someone takes in bomb-making parts, and they go undetected. It sure sounds like their priorities are skewed. Which way did they go, indeed!

Alibar
07-08-2009, 09:04 PM
What troubles me is making this news public,for all walks of life good & bad to see.
Maybe they should address this problem behind closed doors & heads should roll but dont make it public & compound a bad situation.

But, Ben, the leftist media yells at the top of their lungs if there is any semblance of secrecy in our government. Since telling all our secrets to the world is what they want, one would think there would be loud hue and cry that secrets not be public, but, it doesn't happen, which, IMO, shows that the majority want us to go down the drain, which is what the left wants.

Big Ben
07-09-2009, 10:56 AM
Left,right whatever i dont think this is something to play politics with,we go down we all go down.

Alibar
07-09-2009, 11:31 AM
Left,right whatever i dont think this is something to play politics with,we go down we all go down.

I probably don't know enough about it to comment. There was so much criticism of secrecy in the last administration I guess I thought it WAS political. I do realize we all go down, but, I think those who are critical of secrecy and those who reveal what should be secret, do not realize they will go down as much as anyone.

Big Ben
07-09-2009, 11:57 AM
I probably don't know enough about it to comment. There was so much criticism of secrecy in the last administration I guess I thought it WAS political. I do realize we all go down, but, I think those who are critical of secrecy and those who reveal what should be secret, do not realize they will go down as much as anyone.

Who knows if its political or not? I just dont think that anyone should make public the flaws in the security.If flaws do come to light they should address them in house ,not in public for everyone to see.
A poor example ,when i was working as a Corrections officer (retired now thank God) inmates could not have guns ,knifes,etc. , but the administration would let them have pencils that made nice shanks, razors to shave made nice weapons & the list goes on.What im trying to say you cant stop everything from coming into a building that a terrorist can turn into a weapon,all you can do is try to limit the options.

texanne
07-09-2009, 11:59 AM
Left,right whatever i dont think this is something to play politics with,we go down we all go down.

Well said! We need to stop bickering about the different sides of "the aisle", and learn to put our heads together to figure out the best way to solve problems. The powers that be need to put on their statesmen hats and forget their political ones. Our safety is nothing to play games with.