PDA

View Full Version : Nevada Supreme Court considers releasing O.J. Simpson


rem16
08-03-2009, 09:07 PM
By KEN RITTER, Associated Press Writer Ken Ritter, Associated Press Writer – Mon Aug 3, 5:22 pm ET

LAS VEGAS – A trio of Nevada Supreme Court justices focused Monday on whether O.J. Simpson and a former golfing buddy received a fair trial in a gunpoint hotel room heist and whether the case was so unique that the two men should be freed from prison while their appeals are considered.

"This is post-conviction. That's what concerns me," Justice Michael Cherry declared during rare oral arguments by lawyers about whether the former football star and co-defendant Clarence "C.J." Stewart should be allowed to post bond while their appeals are pending.

Cherry, the chairman of the three-judge panel considering the bond request, didn't say how long he and justices Mark Gibbons and Nancy Saitta might take to decide.

It appeared unlikely a ruling would come before an Aug. 12 deadline for Clark County District Attorney David Roger to file a written answer to Simpson's appeal.

Roger, who prosecuted Simpson and Stewart, argued Monday the men got a fair trial, a Nevada jury had spoken, and the pair should continue to serve their sentences for kidnapping and armed robbery.

It is unusual for the Nevada Supreme Court, the state's only appeals court, to hear oral arguments about bond, and it would be even more unusual for Simpson or Stewart to be released. The last such high-profile appellant to get such a chance in Nevada skipped town after posting $100,000 in 1978.

The justices are weighing whether Simpson or Stewart might flee, whether they pose a danger to the community, and if they have a good chance of winning their appeals.

The question of their possible success was the key point of the hearing, and inquiries from the justices shed light on the issues they're considering.

The justices asked each of the defense attorneys what was different about this case to warrant bail on convictions that carried mandatory prison time with no option of probation.

more at link..

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_oj_simpson

Oh no..:groan:

Texas53
08-03-2009, 11:15 PM
If they let O.J. out after just a few months, then in my opinion, American Justice sucks!

But if you are famous or have money or believed to have both, justice for these people is not the same as it is for plain average citizens. jmho

nomadpatti
08-03-2009, 11:19 PM
:eek: :frustratedf:

rem16
08-03-2009, 11:30 PM
If they let O.J. out after just a few months, then in my opinion, American Justice sucks!

But if you are famous or have money or believed to have both, justice for these people is not the same as it is for plain average citizens. jmho

Well, if they let him out on bail, it will be for the appeal process. Galanter is really after Judge Glass for the way she handled the trial, but I don't know if the Justices's will agree with him.

LiveLaughLuv
08-04-2009, 08:24 AM
Roger, who prosecuted Simpson and Stewart, argued Monday the men got a fair trial, a Nevada jury had spoken, and the pair should continue to serve their sentences for kidnapping and armed robbery.

It is unusual for the Nevada Supreme Court, the state's only appeals court, to hear oral arguments about bond, and it would be even more unusual for Simpson or Stewart to be released. The last such high-profile appellant to get such a chance in Nevada skipped town after posting $100,000 in 1978.

The justices are weighing whether Simpson or Stewart might flee, whether they pose a danger to the community, and if they have a good chance of winning their appeals.

He can't get away twice...I think even as the appeals process is part of the justice system, OJ should be held in jail, especially since his roots are in another state...He is not to be trusted, he got away with a double homicide and he cannot get away with this robbery/kidnapping...You can't use self help. He should have called the police and not act like a thug...JMHO :madranting94dp: