PDA

View Full Version : Terms of Use1940 ruling gets Arkansas inmate off death row


London Lass
05-30-2008, 10:27 AM
Terms of Use1940 ruling gets Arkansas inmate off death row

Arkansas' highest court ordered an inmate off of death row on Thursday, citing a 1940 court decision that gave an escape clause from an aggravated-robbery conviction to people trying to recover gambling losses.

Justices ordered a new sentencing hearing for Michael B. Daniels, who said he was attempting to recover $20 he lost in a game of three-card monte when he stabbed and killed James Williams, 52, on Jan. 8, 2006. Daniels claimed during the trial that Williams had cheated in the game.

Justices cited a 68-year-old ruling that said someone couldn't be convicted of aggravated robbery while trying to recover gambling losses. Aggravated robbery was the underlying circumstance when a jury ordered Daniels to die for Williams' death.

The split court reversed Daniels' aggravated robbery conviction and the capital murder charge linked to it, but upheld his conviction for premeditated and deliberate capital murder.

In the majority opinion, Associate Justice Robert L. Brown acknowledged that some could argue the 1940 case was not in the public's interest, but said, "it is nonetheless still good law in Arkansas."

Daniels' attorney, Teri Chambers, said Thursday's ruling "makes sense because you have to be able to commit a theft in order to commit a robbery. You have to be taking someone else's property to commit a theft."

It was unclear whether the ruling had been used to get anyone else off of Arkansas death row.

During the trial, Daniels' attorney admitted that his client stabbed Williams in the head, chest and stomach with a Bowie knife. The attack was recorded on surveillance video.

Prosecutors said there was no evidence that Williams cheated during the card game.

On the Net: Daniels v. State of Arkansas ruling: http://courts.arkansas.gov/opinions/2008a/20080529/cr07-954.pdf

http://people.smu.edu/rhalperi/updates.html

LiveLaughLuv
05-30-2008, 11:10 AM
Three card monte is a con game, eveyone knows that.

Since he lost his $20, his attorney is claiming since it was his own money he was trying to get back and during the commission of this crime, he killed the card game dealer, it doesn't count as murder??? Geez, I think that's a far stretch...

London Lass
05-30-2008, 11:12 AM
I know - bizarre! So $20 has quite literally saved this mans life!

LiveLaughLuv
05-30-2008, 01:41 PM
Daniels' attorney, Teri Chambers, said Thursday's ruling "makes sense because you have to be able to commit a theft in order to commit a robbery. You have to be taking someone else's property to commit a theft.".

He bet $20 and lost, once he lost that bet, the money no longer belonged to him.

I wonder how long that attorney has been holding onto that old law. I'll bet he couldn't wait to use it as a defense.

packy
05-30-2008, 02:05 PM
I wonder if any other states have an old law like that on the books.

London Lass
05-30-2008, 02:06 PM
I wonder if any other states have an old law like that on the books.

If they have, you can bet the laws will be changing pdq now that it's got someone off DR!